Saturday, May 19, 2018

DISCRETION, SUBJECTIVE, OBJECTIVE, VALUE JUDGMENT-- CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL






WE ASK THE PRESIDENT OF INDIA TO PUNISH THE COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY FOR NOT ALLOWING "SECRET BALLOT" WHEN THE VOTE IS DONE ON THE FLOOR OF THE HOUSE..

IN TAMIL NADU THE MANNARGUDI MAFIA KIDNAPPED CHILDREN OF THE MLAs AND MPs IN THE PAST...

WHAT TYPE OF DEMOCRACY ARE WE ?

WE WANT THE THREE BENCH JUDGE PANEL TO BE DE-FROCKED..

THEY CANNOT OVERRULE THE KARNATAKA GOVERNOR .

A STATE GOVERNOR IS VESTED WITH ENORMOUS DISCRETION POWERS -- TO SUSTAIN DHARMA..

NOT A SINGLE JDS VOTER SUPPORTS THE ITALIANS..

THEN HOW ARE THEY ARM TWISTED TO ACCEPT THE ITALIAN RULE IN KARNATAKA..

WE THE PEOPLE WANT SECRET BALLOT

WE WARN THE JUDICIARY ..

capt ajit vadakayil

..



When this planets greatest storm threatened my ship and crew , I used my discretion to do the unimaginable ..

My bosses ashore wanted reasons—

I told them –

 “FUCK OFF , my reasons are SUBJECTIVE— you wont understand it !  

You are worried about money and insurance , I am only concerned about about trust reposed by my crew -- and LIFE ”





PEOPLE ( LIKE LAWYERS TURNED JUDGES ) WHO CANT THINK--  KEEP AWAY FROM THIS POST. 

SOMEONE ASKED ME- 

WHY SHOULD THE CAPTAIN OF A SHIP OR THE GOVERNOR OF A STATE BE AFFORDED  DISCRETIONARY POWERS  WHICH IS "SUBJECTIVE" 

THE REASON IS THE HUMAN BRAIN WORKS DIFFERENT FROM THAT OF A COMPUTER 

NO COMPUTER CAN TELL THE MORAL OF A STORY.. BECAUSE IT DOES NOT HAVE A CONSCIOUS BRAIN 

WHY IS A STATE GOVERNOR GIVEN SO MUCH OF DISCRETIONARY POWERS?     EVEN MORE THAN THE PRESIDENT OF INDIA? 

WELL-- 

IT BOILS DOWN TO SUBJECTIVE AND OBJECTIVE.. 

ON CHEMICAL TANKERS WE HAVE TEN HOUR VETTING INSPECTIONS BY OIL MAJORS LIKE SHELL/ MOBIL ETC .. 

THE WHOLE INQUIRY IS OBJECTIVE.. HUNDREDS OF QUESTIONS.. 

THE LAST QUESTION IS SUBJECTIVE,   AND THIS IS AIMED AT THE HEART OF THE INSPECTOR  ( NOT HIS LEFT BRAIN LOBE )     " WOULD  YOU SAIL ON THIS SHIP FOR A VOYAGE UNDER THE PRESENT CREW AND CAPTAIN WITHOUT RESERVATION" 

THE INSPECTOR COULD HAVE GIVEN 100% MARKS ON THE TEN HOUR OBJECTIVE INQUIRY..    BUT IF HE WRITES THE WORD "NO" FOR THE LAST SUBJECTIVE QUESTION, THE SHIP HAS FAILED.. 

WE CANNOT HAVE EVERYTHING OBJECTIVE-- WE ARE HUMANS  NOT MONKEYS OR COMPUTERS ..

SUBJECTIVE MUST HOLD THE "VETO POWER"..  

VETO POWER CAN NEVER BE GIVEN TO THE OBJECTIVE..

JOHN DEWEY WENT OVERBOARD ABOUT "VALUE JUDGEMENTS "..   HE WAS NOT INTELLIGENT ENOUGH TO UNDERSTAND THE SUBJECTIVE..  

OBJECTIVE IS FOR MEDIOCRE BRAINS, WHO NEEDS CHECKLISTS TO DRESS UP.. 

IF THIS CHECK LIST IS MISSING ,  HE WILL WEAR HIS UNDIES OVER HIS PANTS LIKE PHANTOM



.. SUBJECTIVE NEEDS LEVEL HEADED INTELLEGIENT EXPERTS..




Vikhyat Singh
October 13, 2016 at 10:27 AM
CAPTAIN,
As per sanatan dharm, what is the nature of morality (subjective or objective)?

####################################
Capt. Ajit Vadakayil
October 13, 2016 at 11:55 AM

hi vs,

DON’T EVER BOTHER TO SEEK AN ANSWER TO YOUR QUESTION ( OBJECTIVE/ SUBJECTIVE MORALITY FROM ANY BOOK ON THIS PLANET OR FROM THE INTERNET.

THERE IS NOBODY WHO HAS THE FUCKIN’ WISDOM TO ANSWER YOUR PROFOUND QUESTION .

The reason morality is subjective is because there is no common moral law that ALL people agree on.

If objective moral codes existed like "murder is bad" than there would be no murderers. But there are murderers. The reason most societies outlaw murder is because it is for the logical salvation of the society.

Objective morality is the idea that a certain system of ethics or set of moral judgments is not just true according to a person's subjective opinion, but factually true.

Proponents of this theory would argue that a statement like "Murder is wrong" can be as objectively true as "1 + 1 = 2."

Most of the objective morals promoted today are grounded in Abrahamic religions .

Among Christians, it follows from the ideas of inherent human sinfulness and original sin that one's subjective moral instincts must be categorically classed as evil.

In claustrophobic Abrahamic religions , there is a pervasive message that whatever we're searching for is completely and utterly separate from us.

As per Sanatana Dharma morality has been ingrained within us. Somewhere deep down, embedded in our DNA, is the coding for morality. Somehow people know at a very young age that stealing is wrong.

For some, morality is something that is either taught, learned, or gained through familial contact or social interaction.

Yet there are people who didn't have good parents, or who had no parents at all, or who grew up without much social interaction or exposure to accessible information but who still know the basic "rules" for morality.

For others, morality seems to be something that we have to achieve or earn via some middle man in robes

Morality isn't a rule. It isn't a plumb line. Morality cannot exists without context. Bhagawad Gita was the ultimate lesson in morality within the perimeter of context .

Morality aint no tool to determine who is in and who is out. It is something that is part of each person. We don't earn morality; it earns us.

Morality is a gene -- not one that we can see or study, but one that evolves progressively over time. Unlike other genes, it is affected and altered by the decisions we make and don't make. It is transformed by compassion and deformed by the lack of it.

Morality is in us. We are all moral unless you have criminal DNA and the programming is corrupt.

Its how we choose to use that knowledge that will determine how we nurture the growth of morality within us.

So, the origins of morality lie in each human being but are grown through the everyday process of making choices.

Laws of Karma and Dharma has guided the Hindu since time immemorial . There was never any DOGMA lumped down the Hindu’s throat.

Morals are encouraged by living in a moral society or community. But they are birthed in each person, each individual. They are also spurred on by what we choose to expose our minds to.

Moral subjectivity is not the enemy to the progress of any society; moral homogeneity is.

Moral homogeneity says that everyone needs to see everything the same way, to fit into neat little boxes, and it is used to marginalize those who don't.

Moral subjectivity leads a society to embrace diversity by seeing that a particular worldview isn't the only right one.

A subjective morality is one rooted in human feelings and conscience .

Natural justice is inherent. These are the things that are most important to us, indeed the only things important to us!

CONTINUED TO 2-
Replies


Capt. Ajit Vadakayil
October 13, 2016 at 12:11 PM
CONTINUED FROM 1-

Definition of Subjective:--
Proceeding from or taking place in a person's mind rather than the external world: a subjective decision.
Particular to a given person; personal: subjective experience.
subjective dimension of conscience.


Definition of Objective:- 
Of or having to do with a material object.
Having actual existence or reality.
Uninfluenced by emotions or personal prejudices: an objective critic.
Based on observable phenomena; presented factually: an objective appraisal.
Everything is subjective as soon as it is experienced or thought by a human being.
Objective moral values are moral values that are true independent of the belief of human beings.

RELIGION IS OBJECTIVE .

SPIRITUALITY IS SUBJECTIVE.

OBJECTIVE IS OUTSIDE OF HUMAN BEINGS. WHEN A SHIP INCPECTOR INSPECTS THE SHIP, HE MUST BE OBJECTIVE. HE MUST NOT ALLOW HIS EMOTIONS TO RULE.

SAME WITH A JUDGE IN A COURT. NATURAL JUSTICE AND CONSCIENCE IS LOCKED UP AND THROWN AWAY.

THIS SUITED JEW ROTHSCHILD WHO ENSLAVED INDIA.

ROTHSCHILD CREATED ASHTAVAKRA GITA AND HAS USED HIS FAKE GURUS TO PROPAGATE IT SANATANA DHARMA IS NOT LIKE THE TEN COMMANDMENTS SYSTEM OF SINGLE MESSIAH CHRISTIANITY.

WE HINDUS DO NOT NEED A MESSIAH TO TELL US WHAT IS RIGHT AND WHAT IS WRONG.

LIKE THIS BLOGSITE HINDUISM TELLS ALL TO USE THEIR CONSCIENCE. OBJECTIVE MORALITY BREEDS FALSE EXCUSES

TANGIBLE LAW IS THE OBJECTIVE FORM OF MORALITY. OBJECTIVE IS INDEPENDENT OF PEOPLEs OPINIONS.

OBJECTIVE MORALS FOR CHRISTIANS EMANATE FROM THE TEN COMMANDMENTS.

OBJECTIVE MORALITY IGNORED CONTEXT .

CHRISTIAN / ISLAM MORALITY IS OBJECTIVE, THE SINGLE MESSIAH AND SINGLE HOLY BOOK DICTATES DOGMA.

ATHEIST COMMUNISTS AND SINGLE MESSIAH / HOLY BOOK RELIGIONS ARE OBJECTIVE WITH MORALITY. THEY HAVE FAILED .

RELIGION IS DOING WHAT YOU ARE TOLD REGARDLESS OF WHAT IS RIGHT.

RULES DON’T MAKE US MORAL.

SANATANA DHARMA IS SUBJECTIVE.    SUBJECTIVE IS STRICTLY WITHIN HUMANS BEINGS –IT DERIVES FROM OUR INTANGIBLE CONSCIENCE ALONE.

IN SUBJECTIVE MORALITY PERCEPTION WITHIN PERIMETER OF CONTEXT IS PARAMOUNT.

SUBJECTIVE IS DEPENDENT ON PEOPLEs OPINIONS.

SANATANA DHARMAIS BASED ON CONSCIOUS HUMAN CONSCIENCE. NO MAN CAN MANIPULATE OR SILENCE HIS CONSCIENCE. WE ARE NOT THE SOURCE OF OUR OWN CONSCIENCE.

BHAGAWAD GITA IS OUR GUIDE NOT ASHTAVAKRA GITA COOKED UP BY JEW ROTHSCHILD WITH Dos AND DONTs

ENEMIES OF HINDUISM USES FAKE GURUS LIKE TRIPLE SRI TO CONVERT SANATANA DHARMA TO AN OBJECTIVE RELIGION. SORRY, IT WONT WORK

SPIRITUALLY SOAKED HINDUS ARE SUBJECTIVE WITH MORALITY. ONLY THIS WORKS

MORALITY IS DOING WHAT IS RIGHT, REGARDLESS OF WHAT YOUR ARE TOLD.

SUBJECTIVE MORALITY HAS NO SCOPE FOR EXCUSES. LOVE , COMPASSION AND FAIRNESS MAKE US MORAL.

Hinduism was developed along spiritual lines, NOT religious lines—the reason why 800 years of slavery could NOT stamp out this amazing way of life..

Hinduism is NOT a religion, it is the practice of spirituality by elevating human consciousness in the personal quest for truth.

CONTINUED TO 3-

Capt. Ajit Vadakayil
October 13, 2016 at 12:11 PM

CONTINUED FROM 2-

India and Bali are the last pockets of spirituality on this planet. Why do you think the spirituality seeking white man goes to these places in droves?

These foreigners can comprehend that Hinduism is based on reason and NOT faith -- unless the faith is an extension of reason.

Hinduism is a relentless pursuit of truth, flexible to suit all situations.

At the heart of Hinduism remains mans' essential quest for union with the Absolute supreme the brahmAn. In addition to tradition and moral order, it also signifies the path of knowledge and correct action ( Dharma ).

Islam and Christianity are religions. These religions had Inquisitions.

Jews were too busy following their VULGAR and racist Talmud.

Ahimsa ( non-violence ) even vegetarianism , is a characteristic of Hinduism—due to which vile foreign invaders took advantage..

What the waitress calls SAFFRON TERROR -- is just the hindus making a free choice NOT to be cowards anymore and giving back as good as they got.

Today when a patient and tolerant Hindu gets outraged and decides to retaliate, rivers of blood flows on the streets .

Hinduism can never dream of all this for openness and inclusivity is the essence of Hinduism.

Hinduism is a spiritual code. Know thyself is the quintessence.

Hinduism has a total lack of compulsions. You cannot get ex-communicated for NOT toeing the line.

The diversity, the range, and the lofty metaphysical aspirations of Vedanta are mind boggling.

Loaded truth is delivered or revealed from a divine source and enters the world through a single agent: for example, Abraham in Judaism, Jesus Christ in Christianity, and Muhammad in Islam.

These truths are then recorded in scriptures that serve as a source of knowledge of divine wisdom: the Hebrew Bible, the New Testament of the Christian Bible, and the Koran. In the Hindu tradition, by utter contrast, there is no single revelation.

The Hindu spirituality tradition , unlike other religions -- has always concerned itself with the “human” situation rather than the “our religion “ situation.

Under the doctrine of karma, the ability to make choices remains with the individual-and NOT what is being told as gospel in a holy book .

Ask the Jews—they will say India is the only place where they never got persecuted over thousands of years—they always ran here for refuge.

The reason ?

This country had denizens steeped in spirituality — NOT religious bigots. Hebrew religion and Hinduism co-existed.

Yet today foreign funded Indian TV calls all Hindus bigots –what a joke !.

I AM LUCKY TO BE BORN IN INDIA— HAVING SEEN WHAT THE REST OF THIS PLANET HAS TO OFFER FOR 40 YEARS .!

capt ajit vadakayil 

..

https://www.blogger.com/profile/14410812789424637654

THIS BLOGSITE HAS 621 MILLION PROFILE VIEWS

YET BENAMI MEDIA SINGS THE PRAISES OF AMITABH BACHCHAN AND SUNNY LEONE WHO HAS 4 MILLION UNDER THEIR BELT

PROOF OF THE PUDDING LIES IN THE EATING..

PEOPLE ARE NOT FOOLS..

JUST READ THE MINDLESS SHIT AMITABH BACHCHAN WRITES IN HIS BLOGS .. APUN BHI INTELLECTUAL

TEEE HEEEEE

NOWADAYS EVEN TWINKLE KHANNA IS INTELLECTUAL..  LIKE PAGALIKA GHOSE

capt ajit vadakayil
..

WHY DO WE HAVE SUBJECTIVE ORALS AFTER OBJECTIVE WRITTEN EXAMS ?


IF CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL WAS A JDS MLA WHO CROSS VOTED AT THE FLOOR TEST -- 

AM IN USING MY CONSCIENCE ?,   

OR AM I HORSE TRADED BY CRORES BRIBE  / CABINET BERTH ?.. 

THE BASTARD BENAMI MEDIA OBFUSCATES THIS SIMPLE TRUTH


MANAGERS CAN ONLY DO OBJECTIVE EVALUATIONS

LEADERS CAN DO SUBJECTIVE EVALUATIONS 



THE PERFORMANCE OF A TEAM MEMBER CAN BE EVALUATED ONLY SUBJECTIVELY..

CAN A MANAGER WHO IS FIT ONLY FOR INVENTORIES , EVEN UNDERSTAND THE POST BELOW?



A  TEACHER EVALUATES OBJECTIVELY


A MENTOR EVALUATES SUBJECTIVELY

I INTRODUCED MENTORING AT SEA.





DESH BHAKTI AND DHARMA IS A SUBJECTIVE FEELING..    IT CAN CAUSE BLOOD TO BOIL AND CAUSE YOU TO SACRIFICE YOUR LIFE....


ABOVE THE OBJECTIVE CONSTITUTION LIES ,  THE SUBJECTIVE FEELINGS TO OUR WATAN  AND DHARMA ( NATURAL JUSTICE ) 






IN CONGRESS ,   PATRIOTISM MEANS TO LICK THE WHATSOEVER OF THE ITALIANS 



When my elder son was evaluated , he maxed in the DOVE TAILING OF PERSONAL CORE VALUES WITH COMPANY CORE VALUES..

This is what decides how much STOCK the company wants to give you.   It is SUBJECTIVE EVALUATION of what you are intrinsically worth.

If you work in USA don’t expect to make money by monthly salary scrimping and saving.

You make money on company stock —  which you get as a bonus  .

 If you are lucky you medium size company may sell off to a BIG FISH and you become a millionaire instantaneously. 

Couple of my son friends are now millionaires.



WHEN I RECOMMEND PROMOTION IT IS NEVER ON OBJECTIVE  PAST/ CURRENT  PERFORMANCE.    IT IS BASED ON SUBJECTIVE EVALUATION OF FUTURE POTENTIAL .


I HAVE NEVER EVALUATED A OFFICER ON THE ANSWERS HE GAVE ME,   RATHER I EVALUATED HIM BASED ON THE QUESTIONS HE ASKED ME –   AFTER I ASKED HIM TO READ AN DIGEST A FEW PAGES .


In our human world, there are things that we can measure or test and, therefore, verify or falsify. Consequently, there is no difficulty in discovering or describing the facts. These we call objective judgements.

To sustain DHARMA you cannot apply number crunching or objective judgment--you have to  apply SUBJECTIVE judgments.

This is why a Governor or President  is an experienced and level headed man .  

This is why the President is the Supreme Commander of our armed forces..


THE NEW WORLD ORDER WANTS ONLY OBJECTIVE JUDGMENTS



http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2018/05/discretion-subjective-objective-value.html
WE THE PEOPLE DEMAND THAT THE COLLEGIUM JUDGES WHO OVERRULED THE DISCRETIONARY POWERS OF THE KARNATAKA GOVT BE PUNISHED.. THEY JUST DONT HAVE SUCH POWERS ...



WE ASK MODI-- STRIKE DOWN UNCONSTITUTIONAL COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY AND BRING IN NJAC...
PUT ABOVE COMMENT IN WEBSITES OF--
PRESIDENT OF INDIA
VP OF INDIA
PM MODI
KARNATAKA GOVERNOR
ALL STATE GOVERNORS
CMs OF ALL STATES ( LEAVE OUT MOMOTO AND KACHRA FUCKIN' WAAL )
DGPs OF ALL STATES
ATTORNEY GENERAL SUPREME COURT BAR COUNCIL
SWAMY
GURUMURTY
RSS
VHP
AVBP
AMIT SHAH
SPEAKER LOK SABHA
SPEAKER RAJYA SABHA
AJIT DOVAL 
NITI AYOG
DESH BHAKT JOURNALISTS
ALL CENTRAL-STATE MINISTERS AND MINISTRES
DESH BHAKT LEADERS 
SPREAD ON SOCIAL MEDIA..


A value judgment is a judgment of the rightness or wrongness of something or someone, or of the usefulness of something or someone, based on a comparison or other relativity. As a generalization, a value judgment can refer to a judgment based upon a particular set of values or on a particular value system. A value judgement is a fact that can be judged.

The term value judgment can be used objectively to refer to any injunction that implies an obligation to carry out an act, implicitly involving the terms "ought" or "should". It can be used either in a positive sense, signifying that a judgment must be made taking a value system into account, or in a disparaging sense, signifying a judgment made by personal whim rather than objective thought or evidence

Most commonly the term value judgment refers to an individual's opinion. Of course, the individual's opinion is formed to a degree by their belief system, and the culture to which they belong. So a natural extension of the term value judgment is to include declarations seen one way from one value system, but may be seen differently from another.

Conceptually this extension of definition is related both to the anthropological axiom "cultural relativism" (that is, that cultural meaning derives from a context) and to the term "moral relativism" (that is, that moral and ethical propositions are not universal truths, but stem from cultural context).  A value judgment formed within a specific value system may be parochial, and may be subject to dispute in a wider audience.

Distinctions between objectivity and subjectivity lie at the heart of debates and conflicts in philosophy, morality, journalism, science, and more. Very often "objective" is treated as a vital goal while "subjective" is used as a criticism. 

Objective judgments and claims are assumed to be free from personal considerations, emotional perspectives, etc. Subjective judgments and claims, however, are assumed to be heavily (if not entirely) influenced by such personal considerations.


Computers can achieve true objectivity ..  It cannot be achieved except perhaps in matters like mathematics while everything else must be reduced to degrees of subjectivity.  This is why computers cannot diagnose a disease. It takes a conscious  human brain..


In USA the white man goes to an Indian doctor for SUBJECTIVE diagnosis and then he goes to a white doctor for health  insurance dependent OBJECTIVE  treatment 







I HAVE DONE MORE TO PROTECT THIS PLANET FROM GLOBAL WARMING THAN ANY INDIVIDUAL ON THIS PLANET.     

 MY REASONS HERE ARE OBJECTIVE ..


THE CUNTS IN NGT , INDIAN THINK TANKS AND NITI AYOG WONT EVEN UNDERSTAND

THE COLLECTIVE INTELLECT OF THE ENTIRE INDIAN THINK TANKS ( PACKED WITH CHOOTIYA BUGGERS ) ,    I CAN PUT UNDER THE FORESKIN OF MY UNCIRCUMCISED PRICK AND HAVE SPACE FOR 99% MORE.

INDIAs ARCTIC ICE STATION HIMADRI--  DUS PAISE KA KAAM NAHIN KIYA ABHI TAK !

KOI SHAKH ?!




  
A value judgement is a subjective assessment that a behavior, object, person, principle, etc., is good or bad or something is ought to or not ought to happen. Value judgments involve aesthetical, ethical, ideological, moral, theological and other interpretations and cannot be reduced to arguable statements of fact. A value judgment is an assessment of something as good or bad in terms of one's standards or priorities. If you make a value judgment about something, you form an opinion about it based on your principles and beliefs and not on facts which can be checked or proved.  


THE NEW WORLD ORDER WANTS ONLY OBJECTIVE JUDGEMENTS.. THEY WANT JUSTICE IS BLIND SYSTEM WITHOUT CONTEXT.. 

IF YOU KILL A MAN WHO IS RAPING YOUR 3 MONTH YEAR OLD BABY, YOU ARE A MURDERER.    SEE ROTHSCHILD HAS NOT LICENSED YOU TO KILL. 

ONLY THE MAHARISHIS OF INDIA SPOKE OR WROTE ABOUT CONSCIOUSNESS TILL QUANTUM PHYSICS KICKED IN 90 YEARS AGO—  ALL LIFTED FROM 7000 YEAR OLD VEDAS

Vedanta  is based, not on a linear, but a cyclical or circular understanding of time and causality.  It is the modern mind ( lifted from Vedas without understanding )  which has fixated on linear time and cause and effect.  It is so ingrained in us that it seems difficult to conceive of anything otherwise.

Ancient Maharishis knew how to draw clear lines between the ‘subjective’ and the ‘objective,’ the ‘real’ and the ‘unreal,’ the existent and the non-existent, or the tangible and the intangible.
Spirituality is subjective.   Single messiah/ single holy book religious dogma is objective.

Spirituality cannot be explored using scientific methods because it involves deeply personal, subjective experiences, and in this it differs from the over-riding ambition of science pushed by the NOW  to be objective. 

Merit  is  an entity’s inherent, intrinsic, context-free value, while an entity’s worth is defined as its contextually determined place-bound value.

Leadership is subjective:   we need your experience, expertise, and judgment; we need your relationships, initiative, and innovation; we need your thoughts, opinions, and instincts.  We need core values.  If we didn’t, you would be replaced by a calculator.

In an important sense, leadership is subjective, and that is not a bad thing. We need everyone on our team thinking about how we can develop talent even better, which competencies we need to develop, and how we can best leverage the skills that we have.

And while opinions will differ, and no absolute answers will ever be discovered, leaders have no choice but to work together to hammer out a common leadership platform, i.e., find some common ground in how they define leadership excellence.

 A common leadership platform makes it possible to recruit, develop, and evaluate leaders, and to audit the impact of leadership behavior on individual, team, and organizational performance.

Are core values subjective? Can we always tell if a colleague is breaking a core value, e.g., can we always tell if someone is a bad team player or if he is acting without integrity? 

Sometimes it is hard to tell because we cannot—and don’t want to—observe every employee at every moment. Nor is there a magical vantage point from which we can correctly interpret all behavior. 

But we do have some pretty concrete standards around our core values, and should we see someone bending them “unethically”, then we would be forced to take action.

 We live in a world of color, many colors—and some of those colors even go beyond the range of human perception.    With any objective observation we still need both objective analysis and subjective judgment.

We need to think about intentions and consider context; outcomes and impact; and draw on both logic and gut instinct.





A value judgment is a  statement of how good or bad you think an idea or action is..  People often make value judgments about things without considering them carefully.





WANNA HEAR JOHN DEWEYs BOMBASTIC OBFUSCATION  ABOUT VALUE JUDGEMENT?  HE USES THE WORD VALUE TO BAFFLE WITH BULL.

THIS JEW WITH A MUDDLED MIND WAS CONVERTED TO THE GREATEST MODERN PHILOSOPHER

I WILL KEEP IT SIMPLE OR ELSE NOBODY WILL READ..

WELL YOU NEED TO KNOW , THIS IS THE FUNDA JOHN DEWEY USED TO BRAINWASH MAO..

DO YOU THINK MAO WILL EVER UNDERSTAND THIS SHIT.. FORGET ABOUT HIS ILLITERATE CHINESE PEASANTS WHO NEED CONFUCIUS TYPE OF TALK TO EVEN COMPREHEND THE MOST SIMPLE MATTERS .

“People take sleeping pill and laxative on the same night will wake up in deep shit”— Confucious

http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2013/08/chinese-revolution-biggest-genocide-on.html





LET THE MIND MUDDLING BEGIN !

No experience has pre-ordained value.  Thus, what may be a rewarding experience for one person, could be a detrimental experience for another. The value of the experience is to be judged by the effect that experience has on the individual's present, their future, and the extent to which the individual is able to contribute to society. Ethical inquiry is of a piece with empirical inquiry more generally. It is the use of reflective intelligence to revise one's judgments in light of the consequences of acting on them. Value judgments are tools for enabling the satisfactory redirection of conduct when habit no longer suffices to direct it.  We test our value judgments by putting them into practice and seeing whether the results are satisfactory — whether they solve the problems they were designed to solve, whether we find their consequences acceptable, whether they enable successful responses to novel problems, whether living in accordance with alternative value judgments yields more satisfactory results.We achieve moral progress and maturity to the extent that we adopt habits of reflectively revising our value judgments in response to the widest consequences for everyone of living them out. This pragmatic approach requires that we locate the conditions of warrant for our value judgments in human conduct itself, not in any a priori fixed reference point outside of conduct, such as in God's commands, Platonic Forms, pure reason, or “nature,” considered as giving humans a fixed telos. To do so requires that we understand different types of value judgments in functional terms, as forms of conduct that play distinctive roles in the life of reflective, social beings.  There is a  naturalistic metaethic of value judgments, grounded in developmental and social psychology.The function of value judgments is to guide human conduct. Conduct in the broadest sense,  includes not only overt bodily motion, but also observation, reflection, imagination, judgment, and affective responses to what we observe and think. Value judgments express propositions that are subject to empirical testing and verification. But they are not merely descriptive; their essential function is to guide conduct. Value judgments can be both empirically warranted and action-guiding because they have an instrumental form. They say that if something were done, then certain consequences would follow, which would be liked or valued. Propositions of this form can be tested. The point of making such propositions is to decide upon a course of action that will solve a problem, where the proposition itself is part of the means by which the action is brought about..To locate value judgments, we first need to understand the distinction between valuing and evaluation, and  notions of desire, taste, and interest. We will then consider the instrumental function of value judgments and their experimental verification. At the most primitive level, valuings are tendencies to move toward, acquire, or ingest certain things, or, on the negative side, to avoid, reject, spew out other things. One need not have any idea of what one is valuing in order to value it. In the first instance, then, valuings simply denote impulses toward or away from objects, as when an infant turns toward human voices, or swats away a fly. Valuings of objects as useful can also be immediate — that is, not mediated by cognition or awareness of what one is doing. One simply uses a fork to pick up food, without thinking about it. Habits, then, are also a species of valuing.Desires arise only as the result of reflection on what to do. They are more sophisticated than primitive valuings.. The idea of such isolated pleasures was the result of certain philosophical demands..Thus, value judgments or appraisals result in new valuings. This fact has two implications, one for the nature of valuing, the other for the assessment of value judgments. First, when valuings change in response to value judgments, they become desires, interests, or tastes. Second, because the function of value judgments is to constitute new valuings that solve the individual's predicament, they can be assessed instrumentally, in terms of how well they perform that function. The novice and the connoisseur may both value (like) the same object. But the latter has a reflective and articulate grasp of the features of the object that are liked, plus enough experience with valuations of objects of that type to have warranted confidence that these features merit liking. That is, the connoisseur has enough experience to warrant confidence that there are not further features of the object or consequences of valuing it which, once appreciated, would reverse or detract from the liking. Desires (ends-in-view) do not exist in isolation from each other. We reflect on the consequences of attempting to jointly satisfy our desires. Appraisals of such consequences serve to modify desires so that they are coordinated with one another. Such systematically coordinated desires  are “interests”.Value judgments are instrumental in three senses . The first  we may call the constitutive function of value judgments. The point of appraisal, of making a value judgment, is to bring about the resumption of unified activity, when the normal course of activity has been interrupted by a problematic situation..This situation incites hesitation and doubt about what to do.  Value judgments are essentially practical judgments. They aim to guide action, not just to passively describe things as they are. Making the judgment is the necessary means to deciding on a new course of action that will solve the problem..The content of value judgments is about the value of actions and objects as means — that is, their value in relation to their consequences, or the consequences of valuing them in the situation at hand. Value judgments have the form: if one acted in a particular way (or valued this object), then certain consequences would ensue, which would be valued.. The difference between an apparent and a real good, between an unreflectively and a reflectively valued good, is captured by its value not just as immediately experienced in isolation, but in view of its wider consequences and how they are valued. Value judgments place things in their wider context and judge them in relation to their consequences, more fully considered..While the proximate and constitutive end of a value judgment is the resumption of activity that has been interrupted by a problematic situation, judgment has a remoter end, of using the action decided upon as a means for uncovering new evidence about what to value. Intelligently made value judgments are held provisionally, with an eye toward revising them if the consequences of acting on them are not found valuable. So viewed, value judgments are tools for discovering how to live a better life, just as scientific hypotheses are tools for uncovering new information about the world..John Dewey's pragmatist moral epistemology follows from his instrumental account of value judgments. It is uncontroversial that instrumental judgments are subject to empirical testing and confirmation, since they involve empirical claims about causation. We test scientific hypotheses by bringing about their antecedents and seeing if the results are as they predicted. Similarly, we test value judgments by acting on them and seeing if we value the consequences in the way the judgment predicted. Acting on our value judgments — putting them into practice — supplies the data for confirming or disconfirming them. Roughly speaking, a value judgment hypothesizes “try it, you'll like it” — a statement easily subject to empirical verification and refutation. Intelligent value judgments proceed not by random trial-and-error, but from skilled projection of prior confirmed “try-like” regularities to analogous novel situations, which are continuously modified in light of experiences of the wider consequences of trying in these new situations...John Dewey derived several unsettling implications for traditional morality and traditional philosophical ethics from his moral epistemology. Traditional or conventional morality tries to enforce unquestioning obedience to its precepts.  This was a formula for perpetual immaturity, because it cut off all possibility of learning better ways to live by experimenting with them. Pragmatist moral epistemology also rejects philosophy's a priori, dialectical methods for determining the good and the right. One cannot prove that something is valuable by mere argument. Arguments, at best, make certain value judgments plausible as hypotheses — and even then, only if grounded in experience and reflection on the wider consequences of acting on them. Ultimately, the hypotheses must be tested, by seeing how one values the actual results of putting them into practice. It follows that the dogmatism of traditional philosophical ethics is folly. It hobbles progress in life. Even the best confirmed value judgments can hold only provisionally. Circumstances change, thereby modifying the consequences of acting on particular evaluations. Change requires us to revisit our original appraisals with an eye toward modifying them in light of these new consequences . Moreover, we don't know the consequences of trials not performed. It is therefore always possible that we are missing out on better modes of conduct that we haven't tested, or even imagined.John Dewey's moral epistemology is contextualist. The form of a contextual standard of value is: it solves the problem encountered in this situation (better than other imagined or tested solutions). A person may articulate the problematic features of her situation in various ways: as obstacles, confusions, conflicts, unmet needs, dangers, and so on. The test of a value judgment — whether it “works” — is whether it successfully identifies an action that overcomes the obstacles, clears up the confusions, resolves the conflicts, satisfies the needs, avoids or eliminates the dangers, and so on. The standard of success for value judgments is thus developed internally to the practices at hand, relative to people's descriptions of their problems . Of course, hypothesized solutions may fail in practice. This may lead agents to revise their understandings of their problems, rather than just trying alternative solutions to the same problems. For example, the failure of a course of therapy may lead a doctor to reconsider the original diagnosis. The problematic features of situations are not given. Rather, descriptions of problems are open to experimental testing in tandem with proposed solutions. In upholding contextualism, John  Dewey rejected the idea that standards of correctness for valuing could be devised external to practice. He rejected any conception of intrinsic value as some kind of existence or property that has value in itself, regardless of context, which is the object of practice to bring about, realize, or conform to. Asserting the existence of such values tears the practice of making value judgments out of the contexts that give them meaning and point. This does not mean that one cannot make meaningful general value judgments. Some problems and solutions are of a generalized sort, encountered in many situations that vary widely in their details. Abstract, general value judgments may therefore be useful in a wide range of situations. But this does not mean that they point to values that exist outside of practice..The standard objection to John Dewey's instrumental theory of value judgments is that it concerns the value of things as means only, and not as ends. It fails to fix on what is ultimately important: intrinsic values or final ends. Some ultimate end outside of practice must be postulated as given, as the standard against which the value of acts as means can be judged, lest we fall into an infinite regress. We either need some conception of a summum bonum, justified apart from practical reasoning, toward which acts must aim, or Dewey's theory reduces to a form of Humean instrumentalism, in which ends are given by our desires or immediate likings, and the only question is how to satisfy them. John Dewey's reply to this objection goes to the heart of his moral philosophy. He argued that the character and value of means and ends was reciprocally determined. We do not first already have an end in view, with the only question how to achieve it. We lack a complete conception of our end until we have a complete grasp of the course of action that will take us there. Moreover, a judgment of the value of ends apart from the means needed to get there, and apart from the value of ends as means — as things that have consequences of their own — cannot provide the basis for rational action. Acting on such radically truncated judgments would be crazy. Our judgments of the worth of an end are inextricably tied up with our judgments of the costs of achieving it, both in terms of the means needed to get there and the unintended consequences of getting there. Practical judgment is creative: it institutes new ends-in-view. It is transformative: appraisals affect our immediate valuings of things..The occasion for making value judgments is a problematic situation, in which one's activity is blocked and one does not know what to do. At first, the problem is experienced as an uneasiness and hesitation. Reflection is needed to intellectualize the emotion, to articulate what is the matter. A complete description of the problem to be solved is simultaneously the articulation of a complete solution, a unified course of action identifying a series of steps (means) resulting in an end, which the judger predicts will be found valuable as a complete package.The value of the end depends on the costs and benefits of the means, and the costs and benefits of the further consequences to which the end is judged as a means or cause. A full inquiry into the means needed to achieve the end may lead to a re-evaluation of the end itself. It is irrational to take one's end as fixed before investigating the costs of the means and the consequences of achieving the end . Thus, the standard model of instrumental reasoning, which takes ends as fixed and inquires solely into the means needed to satisfy them, is inadequate. The point of inquiring into means, and into ends considered as means or causes of further consequences, is not merely to determine how to achieve an end, but to appraise the value of the end itself..Practical judgment is creative: it institutes new ends-in-view, new desires.  Judgment at some point runs against the brute act of holding something dear as its limit. Without some prizings that are not themselves subject to appraisal at the time of deliberation, there is nothing to guide practical reasoning. Yet these very prizings may be subject to appraisal at some other time, perhaps even as a consequence of acting on them on this occasion.John Dewey rejected the sharp distinction between character and action, motive and consequence, that this picture presupposes. Thus, we begin with immediate valuings or prizings of things. Such prizings have no cognitive content. When we ask whether something ought to be valued, we enter the domain of appraisal or value judgments. To appraise something is to judge it in relation to the means required to attain it, and as a means or cause of further consequences. Appraisal, then, is fundamentally about means. However, such appraisals transform our original prizings. If we discover that the cost of attaining something prized is too high, we prize it less (reduce or eliminate our tendency to go after it). If we discover that attaining it has further, disvalued, consequences, we also prize it less. If attaining it has further, prized consequences, or if the means to attain it are themselves prized, we value it even more. Now the valuing has cognitive content, and is articulately directed to that content. Now we value or disvalue something under a description. The appraisal of things as means feeds back into our prizing of things as ends. No fixed ends or moral rules could be adequate in a world of constant change and plural and conflicting values  John Dewey casts the distinction between the apparent and the real good in terms of what is valued immediately in impulse and unreflective habit, and what is valued reflectively as an object of intelligent desire.  There is a primacy of the reflective method of inquiry over settling on fixed answers to questions about the good. This can be seen in his critiques and methodological reinterpretations of the three types of theory of goodness dominant today: hedonism, ideal (objective list) theories, and informed desire theory..Hedonism supposes that the value of acts can be reduced to the quantity of pleasure and pain they produce. Estimating such values requires that we be able to break down the pleasures and pains of different activities and experiences into simple identical units, and then sum them up again. John Dewey also resisted the conversion of a method of inquiry into a fixed criterion of value. There is never an end to inquiry — no such thing as complete information — because circumstances are always changing and imagination constructs new possibilities for living Deontological theories tend to identify the right either with fixed laws or rules of conduct, such as the Ten Commandments, or with a single supreme principle of morality, such as the Categorical Imperative, understood as supplying a decision procedure in ethics. The attempt to specify substantive rules of right conduct for all cases founders on the need to make exceptions for different circumstances. “Thou shalt not kill” cannot be taken at face value, given the justifiability of killing in self-defense. Individuals begin their lives as human societies did historically: acting on impulse and custom. These modes of conduct, being unselfconscious and shortsighted, cannot handle all the challenges life poses, and generate problems of their own. Thus arises the need for reflective appraisal of conduct in view of its wider consequences, with the aim of controlling future conduct by means of these appraisals, so as to solve the problems at hand. This practical reasoning uses the same general experimental method as theoretical reasoning does. We begin with certain given facts: these are our immediate valuings of things by impulse and habit. The data for appraisal of these valuings come from the consquences of acting on them, along with the ways we value these consequences. John Dewey's identification of intelligent reflection with experimental methods applied to nature might be thought to suggest a narrowly scientistic worldview, in which values are reduced to purely subjective, arational “oughts” or likings applied to inherently value-free facts or natural kinds discovered and defined independently of human valuations. John Dewey's project aims to unify scientific with humanistic inquiry rather than to enforce divisions between the two. While intelligent humanistic inquiry partakes of experimental method, scientific inquiry itself is an art Recall that value judgments are instruments that, while they may have been found useful in past cases, may fail to successfully guide current conduct. To the extent that a work of art is capable of evoking novel appreciative experiences, the application of established standards of aesthetic value to the work may close off such novelty and reduce the experience of it to a stereotyped, boring recapitulation of past experiences (if the artwork happens to meet the old standard), or, worse (if it fails to meet the old standard) provoke a stunted reaction of offense or disapproval. In such cases the aesthetic judgment would have failed to do its job, which is to enhance perception by drawing the observer's attention to features of the object, and of relations among the object, its creator, and observers, that are understood as meaningful and thereby excite feeling.. Criticism renders the aesthetic value of an artwork objective to the extent that it succeeds in evoking common appreciative experiences among many observers by drawing their attention to the same features and relations of the artwork . Aesthetic value is not possessed by works of art alone, but can also be possessed by tools and other instruments . In the course of repairing a shelf, one might use a hammer and feel its heft and balance to be splendidly proportioned for the task, feel the handle to be molded in a way that perfectly fits one's hand, perceive its materials to have been selected with attention to their fitness for driving nails, and so forth. Such intelligent appreciation of the hammer in one's direct experience of it amounts to an aesthetic valuation of it, insofar as the experience itself is savored and one's perceptive faculties are not merely identifying instrumentally valuable features of the hammer for future reference but actively engaged in appreciating the aptness of its design and materials. The repair job, too, can have aesthetic value to the extent that one experiences it as a unified, smoothly unfolding process, beginning with an astute assessment of the required operations, leading to the skilled, fluid, unfrustrated execution of these operations, and ending with what is appraised and prized as a successful conclusion--the object experienced as satisfactorily repaired. When the experience of this process as aptly unifying means and ends absorbs one's appreciative attention, either as actor or as observer, it has aesthetic value.
John Dewey's aesthetic theory thus provides the basis for understanding his critique of work as it exists in societies sharply divided by class. In such societies, the processes of work are reduced to merely mechanical operations assigned to a servile class, and divorced from consummatory experiences of the propertied, leisure class that enjoys the products of others' labor. Class division, by divorcing means from ends (production from consumption) and intelligent planning from physical operations, reduces physical labor to a tedious, mindless, meaningless mechanical exercise of habit, which thereby lacks aesthetic value in lacking unity and intelligent appreciation. The challenge of the modern day is to consider how work, and human activity generally, can be reformed so that it has aesthetic value and is thus no longer valued merely instrumentally.. John Dewey also stressed the ways abstract philosophical doctrines are socially embodied, frequently so as to rationalize and reinforce stultifying and unjust social arrangements.  The sharp dichotomy  between purely instrumental and intrinsic goods both reflects and reinforces an organization of work life that reduces it to drudgery. Since work is of merely instrumental value, so the thinking goes, there is no point in trying to make it interesting to those who do it. The dichotomy also rationalizes oppressive class divisions. Insofar as the good life is conceived in terms of devotion to or enjoyment of purely intrinsic, noninstrumental goods (such as intellectual contemplation and the appreciation of beauty), it is a life that can be led only by a leisured class, whose members do not have to spend their time earning a living. This class depends upon a working class whose function is to provide them with the leisure they need to pursue the good life. If the basic ability to think independently is developed, people will be able to face the future with confidence rather than with fear.









HEY JOHN BABY—  

KISKO PEHLA GAAND MEIN DAALENGA ? 

BOURGEOIS KOH,   YAH TOH PROLETARIAT KOH – 

BOLOH TOH “COMMON MINIMUM PROGRAM “ EKK HAATH MEIN PAKADKE GHUSAENGAA ?

SAALA IS SE ACHCHA PHILOSOPHY ISS BLOGSITE MEIN MILENGA…

   
HE KEEPS WRITING— HE DOES NOT CARE IF NOBODY READS 
.  
HARDLY ANY POST GETS A SINGLE COMMENT.

 ITNA ZOR DIMAAG PEH KAUN DAALENGA ?

PUDDINGS LIE IN MILLIONS AROUND WHICH NOBODY WANTS TO EAT..

WE BOTH STARTED BLOGGING IN THE SAME YEAR … 

I DELETE MORE THAN  40% OF THE COMMENTS .. SO AS NOT TO DILUTE THE COMMENTS SECTION..



Below: Before the white invader came to India , there was no caste system... 













CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL CAN FIT THE INTELLECT OF A THOUSAND JOHN DEWEYs UNDER THE FORESKIN OF HIS UNCIRCUMCISED PRICK AND HAVE SPACE FOR 99% MORE.     

HE HAS THE CEREBRAL WHEREWITHAL TO TELL THE EMPEROR  “ HEY CUNT, YOU ARE NAKED !”

SOMEONE ASKED ME

WHY I AM SO UPSET WITH JOHN DEWEY AND SIDNEY HOOK-- THE JEWISH COMMIE PROFESSORS WHO BRAINWASHED BR AMBEDKAR AND ALSO DID THE CHINESE COMMIE REVOLUTION...

LISTEN --

I WAS A CHANGE MANAGER AT SEA-- PEOPLE WHO EXPERIENCED IT WILL VOUCH, CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL IS THE BEST CHANGE MANAGER ON THIS PLANET..


MY METHODS WERE ALL ABOVE BOARD-- THERE WAS NO SLIMY COERCIVE PERSUASION ..IT WAS MORE ABOUT AROUSING CONSCIOUSNESS AND CONSCIENCE..
AND I KEPT IT VERY SIMPLE..

http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2010/12/change-management-capt-ajit-vadakayil.html

http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2013/04/domino-effect-in-change-management-capt.html


I AM A MILLION TIMES MORE CAPABLE THAN JOHN DEWEY OR SIDNEY HOOK IN ADOPTING SLIMY BACK HANDED METHODS -- I NEVER DID THAT

ALL WESTERN PHILOSOPHERS DIPPED INTO OUR HOLY UPANISHADS.. THEY EXTRACTED THE GIST BUT THEN USED IT IN A MANNER IT WAS NOT MEANT TO BE USED..

SCENARIO ONE: YOU DIP YOUR FINGER INTO A JAR OF HONEY AND PUT IT INTO THE MOUTH OF A SMALL BABY--AND THE BABY CLAPS IN GLEE .

SCENARIO TWO: YOU DIP YOUR SYPHILITIC PRICK INTO A JAR OF HONEY AND PUT IT INTO THE MOUTH OF A SMALL BABY -- AND THE BABY CLAPS IN GLEE.

RESULTS ARE THE SAME-- BUT ONE METHOD IS IMMORAL..

ALL THESE WESTERN PHILOSOPHERS WERE IMMORAL BASTARDS-- OUR VEDIC MAHARISHIS WERE MORAL AND HONORABLE..

DEWEY HAS STOLEN FROM JEAN JACQUES ROUSSEAU , WHO IN TURN STOLE FROM PLATO..

PLATO STOLE FROM KODUNGALLUR UNIVERSITY ( HE WAS A STUDENT THERE ) , OWNED BY THE CALICUT KING 

USING CORRUPTED PHILOSOPHY JEAN BABY ( JACOBIN CLUB-- Société des Jacobins, amis de la liberté et de l'égalité ) CONDUCTED THE FRENCH REVOLUTION ..

I HAVE SEEN HOW COMMIE JNU PROFESSORS AND COMRADE STUDENTS RAN AROUND JNU CAMPUS SHOUTING "LAAL SALAAM" AND "LIBERTY EQUALITY FRATERNITY " DURING THE KANHAIYA KUMAR EPISODE -- ROTHSCHILD COINED CALL

http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2015/11/the-french-revolution-conceived-and.html

JOHN DEWEY WAS THE FATHER OF THE CHINESE REVOLUTION

http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2013/08/chinese-revolution-biggest-genocide-on.html

WHEN I SEE BRAINWASHED COMMIES LIKE SITARAM YECHURY, DANIEL RAJA, BRINDA KARAT ETC ON TV MOUTHING NONSENSE -- I PUKE MENTALLY ..

John Dewer obfuscated , replacing simple words with bombastic words --to sound like a intellectual.. His CHOOTIYA followers claimed they understood him -- APUN BHI INTELLECTUAL.

PROBABLY ONE DAY I WILL PEN A POST ON JOHN DEWEY.. IT TAKES A CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL TO DISMANTLE THIS SLIMY BASTARD..

capt ajit vadakayil
..







  • SOMEONE ASKED ME TO PROVIDE SOME MASALA ABOUT JOHN DEWEY AND HIS DISCIPLE SIDNEY HOOK.

    BOTH WERE JEWS AND BOTH WERE COMMIES. WHICH MAKES THEM NEOCONS.. BOTH WERE PART OF THE US DEEP STATE. 
    BOTH WERE PROFESSORS IN COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY WHO WERE ASKED BY JEW ROTHSCHILD TO BRAINWASH BR AMBEDKAR...

    http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2012/08/cnn-ibn-poll-greatest-indian-since.html

    http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2015/10/the-only-dalit-freemason-of-india-capt.html


    JEW ROTHSCHILD CREATED COMMUNISM.. GERMAN JEW KARL MARX WHO WROTE THE DAS CAPITAL WAS ROTHSCHILDs COUSIN..

    READING DAS KAPITAL WAS A PIECE OF CAKE.. BUT READING JOHN DEWEYS PHILOSOPHY WAS MIND DRAINING-- IT WAS NONSENSE .. BAFFLING WITH BULL

    I DARE ALL INDIAN COMMIE INTELLECTUALS ( ARNAB GOSWAMI SAYS SITARAM YECHURY IS AN INTELLECTUAL GIANT.. TEE HEEE ) TO READ THE BOOKS OF JOHN DEWEY AND SIDNEY HOOK.. 



    AFTER THAT IF THEY CAN COLLECTIVELY ANSWER A 200 ITEM EXAM PAPER SET BY CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL AND SCORE  3% --- I WILL EAT MY OWN HEAD..
    John Dewey wrote about epistemology, metaphysics, aesthetics, art, logic, social theory, and ethics. All lifted from Upanishads with VERY poor understanding.

    Dewey baby was a major educational reformer for the 20th century.

    BR Ambedkar was sent to Columbia by Rothschild .. He earned his master's degree in 1915, and his Ph.D. in economics in 1928. In 1952, Columbia presented him with an honorary doctorate of law.

    Jew John Dewey, was sent to China to launch Rothschild’s Communism . He was there for nearly 3 years 1919 to 1921 AD.

    In 1903, opium founded Yale Divinity School established a number of schools and hospitals throughout China that were collectively known as 'Yale in China.', which was an an intelligence network of Jew Rothschild.

    One of 'Yale in China's' most important students was JEW Mao Zedong.

    Many political and social leaders of the next decades emerged at this time—all brainwashed by JEW John Dewey. When Mao traveled with Professor Yang Changji, his college teacher and future father-in-law, to Beijing during the May Fourth Movement in 1919, John Dewey was with him, as a brainwasher

    John Dewey’s works are widely read on Chinese campuses even today.

    On the afternoon of May 4 1919 over 3,000 students of Peking University and other schools marched from many points to gather in front of Tiananmen.

    They shouted such slogans as "Struggle for the sovereignty externally, get rid of the national traitors at home". These slogans were provided by John Dewey.

    The next day, students in Beijing as a whole went on strike and in the larger cities across China, students, patriotic merchants, and workers joined protests.

    Rothschild’s agent John Dewey got all Rothschild controlled newspapers to relay the People’s march across the country.

    John Dewey organized mass strikes in Shanghai, a general strike of merchants and workers nearly devastated the entire Chinese economy.

    John Dewey leading from behind , founded the 1921 Communist Party of China, in 1921

    http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2013/08/chinese-revolution-biggest-genocide-on.html

    CONTINUED TO 2-

  • CONTINUED FROM 1--

    Jew Rothschild sent Jew Bertrand Russell’s to China in the fall of 1920, to deliver lectures on Communism .

    Mao claimed that the May Fourth Movement was a stage leading toward revolution:

    Master brainwasher JEW John Dewey’s DEMOCRACY AND EDUCATION (1916) is one of the most dangerous books ever written – it is ten times more harmful than Das Kapital.

    I had to read this book twice to get a handle on what went on in John Dewey’s commie mind. Some parts of his book are a twisted version of our Upanishads.

    " The individual is a meaningful concept only when regarded as an inextricable part of his or her society, and the society has no meaning apart from its realization in the lives of its individual members. Mere physical growing up and mastery of the bare necessities of subsistence will not suffice to reproduce the life of the group. Deliberate effort and the taking of thoughtful pains are required"

    BLAH BLAH FUCKIN’ BLAH ! TO AN INTELLIGENT MAN JOHN DEWEY IS FULL OF SHIT..

    DEWEY BABY CAN BRAINWASH BR AMBEDKAR IN AN HOUR

    IT WILL TAKE DEWEY BABY A HUNDRED LIFE TIMES TO BRAINWASH CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL


    JOHN DEWEY AND SIDNEY HOOK BRAINWASHED BR AMBEDKAR AT COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY --DOUBLE WHAMMY ( WHO MENTORS JNU COMMIE PROFESSORS )

    John Dewey died after a short illness 2 June 1952, as Ambedkar was on his way to New York. Writing to his Chitpavan JEW wife, Savita, he lamented that   “there are many old friends who have gathered around me and are helping me in all sorts of ways. I was looking forward to meeting Prof Dewey. But he died on the 2nd when our plane was in Rome  OOOHH   I am so sorry. I owe all my intellectual life to him. He was a wonderful man.”

    DOUBLEAGENT JEW COMMIE Sidney Hook ( a CIA poodle ) received the Presidential Medal of Freedom from Ronald Reagan.

    Sidney Hook ( died 1989) was tom tome as a American philosopher of the Pragmatist school known for his contributions to the philosophy of history, the philosophy of education, political theory, and ethics.

    After embracing Communism in his youth, Hook was later known for his criticisms of totalitarianism, both fascism, and Marxism–Leninism.

    BALLS TO THIS GRUESOME THREESOME

    capt ajit vadakayil
    ...



    1. ALFRED KINSEY NOW GETS KICKED INTO VADAKAYILs GARBAGE BUCKET..

      http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2015/08/homosexuality-pedophilia-deviant-porn.html


      AAA ) HERE IS THE LIST OF MAHA MERUS WHO FOOLED THE WORLD , WHOM I HAVE TRASHED INTO THE GARBAGE BIN OF THE PLANET.

      GARBAGE BUCKET LIST:

      1) BERTRAND RUSSEL
      2) ROMILA THAPAR
      3) IRFAN HABIB
      4) NOAM CHOMSKY
      5) RAMCHANDRA GUHA
      6) SHELDON POLLOCK
      7) SIGMUND FREUD
      8) GEORG WILHELM HEGEL
      9) AMARTYA SEN
      10) WENDY DONIGER
      11) FREIDRICH WILHELM NIETZSCHE
      12) IMMANUEL KANT
      13 ) BARUCH SPINOZA
      14) ALBERT EINSTEIN
      15) ISAAC NEWTON
      16) GUGLEILMO MARCONI
      17) CHARLES DARWIN
      18) KARL MARX
      19) MAX WEBER
      20) THOMAS ALVA EDISON
      21) FIBONACCI
      22) BARKHA DUTT
      23) ADMIRAL LN RAMDAS , WIFE LALITA AND DAUGHTER KAVITA.
      24) EDWARD BERNAYS
      25) JOHN DEWEY
      26) GEORGE IVANOVICH GURDJEIFF
      27) PETER D OUPENSKY
      28) OPRAH WINFREY
      29) RICHARD BANDLER AND JOHN GRINDER
      30) CHRISTIANE AMANPOUR
      31) STEPHEN HAWKING
      32) SIDNEY HOOK
      33) ALFRED KINSEY

      NOTE: MENTAL MIDGETS LIKE ROMILA THAPAR , IRFAN HABIB , RAMACHANDRA GUHA, SHELDON POLLOCK, WENDY DONIGER , BARKHA DUTT , RAMDAS FAMILY MUST BE THANKFUL THAT THEY ARE INCLUDED AMONG A LIST OF CEREBRAL GIANTS

      #########################

      BBB ) HERE ARE PEOPLE WHO MADE A DENT IN THE UNIVERSE— THEY GET THE "VADAKAYIL PRIZE". THIS IS NOT A VESTED “NOBEL PRIZE “

      1) NIKOLA TESLA
      2) DIMITRI MENDELEYEEV
      3) IE IRODOV
      4) ARYABHATTA
      5) SRINIVASAN RAMANUJAN
      6) CHANAKYA
      7) ADI SHANKARACHARYA
      8) APOLLONIUS ( AN INDIAN SAGE –WHO LEGACY WAS SHIFTED ON TO A COOKED UP JESUS IN 325 AD )
      9) "JOHN DOE"
      10) JULIAN ASSANGE
      11) SWAMI CHINMAYANANDA
      12) GARY STEPHEN WEBB
      13) GEORGE ORWELL.
      13) CESAR MILLAN
      14) HENRY FORD.

      CCC) DOWN THE SHIT HOLE----

      1) SUHEL SETH
      2) PRITISH NANDI
      3) DILIP CHERIAN
      4) PRANNOY JAMES ROY
      5) AROON PURIE
      6) VINEET JAIN
      7) SHEKHAR GUPTA
      8) SAGARIKA GHOSE AND HUSBAND RAJDEEP SARDESAI
      9) SHOBHAA DE
      10) SIDHARTH VARADARAJAN AND WIFE NANDINI SUNDAR
      11) KAMALHAASAN
      12) AUDREY TRUSCHKE
      13) NOSTRODAMUS
      14) MANI SHANKAR AIYAR

      capt ajit vadakayil
      ..







  • Sorry captain

    So How can we call capt amrinder singh a level headed person who does not care WTE. How he is a hero and champion. The person who cant stand against the party which massacred sikhs be an honourable man...?

    He is another puppet whose relatives are involved in corruption. He is patiala king. Since when kings became heros with honour and character...since rothschild enslaved india.

    You said cm capt amrinder as the tallest leader in congress at present.....which way he is sir...?

    Sorry for bothering you...

    I know when we glorify someone ...without knowing, which is impossible too, we are bound to fail. All you can declare is about you....all i can declare and stand to be true ....is about me.

    How can I declare that another person will stand to my words...

    How can you declare that I will stand true to your words....?

    When you glorified capt amrinder....i really thought he may be the man of some morale.....

    But he proved wrong.....

  • CAPT AMARINDER SINGHs CALL TO PUNISH KARNATAKA GOVERNOR SHOWS THAT HIS KNOWLEDGE OF THE CONSTITUTION IS ZERO...

    NO JUDGE CAN OVERRULE THE DISCRETIONARY POWER OF THE GOVERNOR

    I HAD THE PROBLEM WHEN I WAS A YOUNG CAPTAIN AT SEA..

    THE OFFICE BOSSES ( MOSTLY STUPID ENGINEERS ) GAVE DIRECT ORDERS TO CAPTAIN

    I REPLIED " NOBODY CAN DARE TELL CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL HARD A PORT OR HARD A STARBOARD ON THE SHIP HE COMMAND S"

    MANY TIMES THERE WAS MASSIVE SHOWDOWNS --I ALWAYS STUCK TO MY GUNS AND WON..
    I WAS INSTRUMENTAL IN GETTING A MARITIME LAWS PASSED ABOUT "CAPTAINS OVER RIDING AUTHORITY " BASED ON HIS SUBJECTIVE DISCRETION VIA IMO ..

    The International Maritime Organization (IMO), is a specialised agency of the United Nations responsible for regulating shipping. The IMO was established in Geneva in 1948 and came into force ten years later, meeting for the first time in 1959. 

    Headquartered in London, United Kingdom, the IMO currently has 174 Member States and three Associate Members.

    PEOPLE WHO KNOW CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL WILL SAY ON THIS HARDCORE CAPTAIN HAS THE GAAAND MEIN TATTI TO TAKE ON HIS SHORE BOSSES AND TELL THEM-- 

    I AM THE FUCKIN' CAPTAIN-- I SHALL DECIDE WHAT IS GOOD FOR MY SHIP AND MY CREW... MERA MARRJJEEE.

    AND I UNSHEATHED THE CAPTAINS SWORD SEVERAL TIMES --AND ALWAYS WON... THESE WERE TIMES WHEN THEY WAS NO WRITTEN LAW TO SUPPORT ME..

    TODAY CAPTAINS OVERRIDING DISCRETIONARY AUTHORITY IS ENGRAVED IN STONE IN ISM CODE..

    The International Safety Management (ISM) Code provides an international standard for the safe management and operation of ships at sea.

    THERE WAS A TIME WHEN MY ISRAELI JEWISH CHARTERERS IN TEL AVIV TRIED TO RUN ROUGH SHOD OVER ME ( THEY ARE USED TO SLAVE CAPTAINS ) -- I DROPPED ANCHOR OFF HOLLAND AND SAID -- I ASKED YOU FOR 3 HOURS , YOU REFUSED--NOW I TAKE 3 DAYS AND YOU CANT DO A FUCK ABOUT IT.

    THEY ASKED ME MOSSAD STYLE-- "CAPTAIN , ARE YOU DECLARING WAR ON US ?"



    I SAID "INDEED -- MY WAR ELEPHANTS ARE GETTING ARMOURED RIGHT NOW"
    WE ARE GOING TO SLEEP AND THEN WE WILL HAVE A PARTY.. LET YOUR TUG POWERED BARGES WITH CHEMICALS WAITING AT TERNEZUEN ( BELGIUM ) WAIT.. 

    I CANT TELL ALL THIS AS JUNIOR CAPTAINS WILL TRY THE SAME THING AND GET THEIR BALLS CHOPPED OFF.

    READ SECTION 5.2 OF THE LINK BELOW--

    http://www.admiraltylawguide.com/conven/ismcode1993.html

    TWO INSTANCES WHEN I TOLD MY SHORE BOSSES TO FUCK THEMSELVES ? YOU CANNOT BE A LIVING LEGEND AT SEA --JUST LIKE THAT.. 

    http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2010/12/super-typhoon-bart-perfect-storm-capt.html

    http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2011/02/el-nino-and-la-nina-mariners-overview.html


    capt ajit vadakayil
    ..






  • http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2979531/Chinese-worker-26-making-Apple-iPhones-died-enduring-12-hour-shifts-seven-days-week-two-months-bosses-vowed-clean-expose-factory-conditions-family-claim.html

    ReplyDelete
    Replies

    Capt. Ajit Vadakayil
    March 11, 2015 at 6:59 PM

    hi m81,

    i do NOT think anybody on the PLANET was abused so much when it came to REST HOURS as CHEMICAL TANKER SAILORS.

    the shipowners and tech managers kept UNDER MANNING the ships .

    no captain was willing to point out to the elephant in the room-- because he would NOT be re-employed after a 4 month contract.

    i had put my finger on the TIP OF THE ICEBERG in the post below-- and i have done more than any other captain at sea to resist SAILORS BEING SLAVES at sea.

    http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2013/09/king-ravana-of-ramayana-hero-or-villian.html

    ##########################################

    Capt. Ajit Vadakayil
    September 24, 2013 at 9:18 PM
    hi n,

    everybody has to manage his own life, the way it suits him best.

    some students like to get up early in the morning and study, while there are some who like to study late at night.

    when work becomes play you enjoy it.

    4 decades of my life at sea was PLAY-- i kept it that way.

    sailors who have sailed with me or the people who know me will tell you that the ships i commanded were the happiest at sea, yet the most efficient and effective ..

    work or life cannot become PLAY if rigid rules and time tables are set by a third party.

    not many people have the guts or the clout to play by his own rules and terms .

    i could get real HARDCORE.

    want an example ? -- do NOT try this !!

    that is why i always tell my juniors that i am a poor role model.

    #####

    i had my jewish charterers from tel aviv doing PUSH PUSH.

    my ship was ready to load at ternezuen,

    and since my crew had worked their aS$es off i needed to give them a 3 hour break to wash and have a proper meal , without being rushed.

    so my charterers say " captain , we need you to pick up river pilot and berth immediately -- 12 barges are waiting with different parcel chemicals ".

    so i tried reasoning with them " all i am asking for is 3 hours, i am NOT asking for a full day of SABBATH. we are men NOT machines.".

    to cut a long story short they got needled by the sabbath reference and changed their tone to vicious " CAPTAIN WE DONT CARE BLAH BLAH WE WE WE WE !!! BLAH ----"

    so i tell them " not it is gonna be 3 DAYS and not 3 HOURS "

    i could cover myself up as their tank cleaning policy was as per a STUPID dutch vervey's guide which did overkill for epoxy tanks with frames, and NOT for nextgen smooth stainless steel tanks.

    so i send them a 3 day BAR DIAGRAM tankcleaning plan -- though my tankcleaning was already over, and they knew it too.

    they send a dutch pilot at anchorage , i drove him away-telling i am the captain, not a jew sitting in fu#kin' tel aviv.

    and then i send a email to my technical managers ,in hongkong, that i plan to have a party tomorrow night.

    -- and i did exactly that !!.

    now you get the drift why i do NOT have lines on mE face, right?

    i do NOT allow anybody to write my biography at sea. it will be just too explosive.

    several radio officers have sought my permission to take copies of my official messages to their homes. they wanted to read it in their old age , to derive HUMAN SPIRIT.

    punch into google search-
    HAPPINESS FROM WITHIN VADAKAYIL

    i never allowed them.

    CONTINUED TO 2-

    Delete

    Capt. Ajit Vadakayil
    March 11, 2015 at 7:00 PM

    CONTINUED FROM 1-

    capt ajit vadakayil
    ..
    #####################################

    I HAD PUT A SEPARATE POST -

    http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2010/12/fatigue-on-chemical-tankers-capt-ajit.html

    PEOPLE WHO KNOW ME WILL TELL YOU THAT CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL IS THE ONLY CAPTAIN REPEAT –ONLY CAPTAIN - AT SEA WHO UNLEASHED THE “SWORD OF MASTER’S AUTHORITY” AT SEA –

    AGAIN AND AGAIN --

    MUCH BEFORE IT BECAME AN OVER-RIDING SAFETY CONCEPT VIA IMO / ISM CODE / SMS/ LAW..

    Capt ajit vadakayil
    ..
    ##################################

    HERE IS ANOTHER COMMENT IN THE LINK BELOW-
    http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2010/03/gold-finger-ajit-vadakayil.html
    Capt. Ajit Vadakayil
    September 6, 2013 at 9:44 AM
    hi,

    dr kalam is the MOST respected man in india.

    in my opinion he is a good man.

    in india can the president even fart without taking permission?

    he can-- but they do NOT knwo their own powers.

    seshan the election commissioner showed that he knew his powers.

    i was a captain in SCI ( indian public sector underatking ) for nine years.

    my ship was highly disciplined -- while the rest of the fleet , the least you say the better.

    i knew my powers.

    i derived my power DIRECT from the MERCHANT SHIPPING ACT, vested on me by the president of india, the parliament and the constitution.

    i cared two hoots for the company written rules.

    even my bosses ashore were terribly scared of me -- because they knew that i could quote a relevant clause and put them in deep sh#t.

    later i was a captain in foreign companies for 21 years.

    i derived my powers from international safety at sea regulations.

    i cared two hoots for company STANDARD PRACTICES.

    i would send a message to the company or charterers ( all foreigners ) stating that i am "UNLEASHING THE SWORD OF CAPTAIN'S AUTHORITY"

    -nobody used to dare to cross swords with me. people at sea know HARDCORE capt vadakayil, when it came to treating penquins and sea gulls as more valuable than human sailors..

    very recently an ISM code has been written, where masters authority is laid down.

    the gist is -- when you sit on a chair, know the written powers vested to that chair.

    it is about the CHAIR-- not the MAN.

    capt ajit vadakayil

    ..



    THIS DEEP STATE OPERATIVE RAMCHANDRA GUHA WILL SOON BE IN JAIL--  

    HE HAS BEE CARELESS 





    http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2018/05/discretion-subjective-objective-value.html

    RAMCHANDRA GUHA SAYS VAJUBAHI VELA HAS NO REPUTATION ...

    JAIL AWAITS GUHA..

    SANJAY NIRUPAM CALLED THE GOVERNOR A DOG... 

    BJP DOES NOT HAVE HONOUR???.

    SEND THE POST ABOVE TO--

    KARNATAKA GOVERNOR
    RAM CHANDRA GUHA
    AMIT SHAH
    SWAMY
    GURUMURTHY
    RSS
    VHP
    AVBP
    RAJNATH SINGH
    AJIT DOVAL
    PMO
    PM MODI
    LAW MINISTER

    THE HOLLYWOOD MOVIE "THE SOCIAL NETWORK " IS GOING ON ON AXN TV...

    THE MOVIE TELLS THE TRUTH... 

    DIVYA NARENDRA AND THE WINKLEVOSS TWINS COMPLAIN TO THE JEW PRESIDENT OF HARVARD UNIVERSITY , THAT JEW MARK ZUCKERBERG STOLE THEIR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ( FACEBOOK )...

    THE JEW PRESIDENT OF THE UNIVERSITY JUST TELLS THEM TO GET OUT OF HIS OFFICE...

    IN MOST IVY LEAGUE US/ UK UNIVERSITIES ( ROTHSCHILDs OPIUM MONEY FOUNDED ) THE JEW DEAN AND PROFESSORS HELP IN STEALING INTELLECTUAL RIGHTS ON NON-JEW STUDENTS TO BE PASSED ON TO A JEW STUDENT..
    THE WHOLE IDEA IS TO DO PROPAGANDA THAT JEWS ARE AN INTELLIGENT RACE...

    ECG SUDARSHAN LEARNT THE HARD WAY.. HIS INTELLECTUAL RIGHTS WAS PASSED ON TO THREE JEWS--ONE OF THEM A PAKISTANI AHMEDDIYA JEW NAMED ABDUS SALAM...

    http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2013/08/dr-ecg-sudarshan-denied-nobel-prize-for.html

    DURING THE FUNERAL OF MATH GENIUS RAMANUJAN SRINIVASAN HIS YOUNG WIDOW SUDDENLY STARTED CRYING LOUDLY-- AND SHE TOLD ABOUT THE INTELLECTUAL RIGHTS OF HER HUSBAND BEING STOLEN. ..

    RAMANUJANs LOST DIARY IS A WIKIPEDIA POST..

    http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2011/11/fractal-mind-of-srinivasa-ramanujan.html

    HUNDREDS OF NON-JEWS HAVE KEPT QUIET , BECAUSE THE SYSTEM WAS THAT WAY...

    INDIAN STUDENTS ( WHO TOOK LOANS ) WERE SCARED OF BEING DEPORTED , WITH LOSS OF VISA..

    JEW ALBERT EINSTEIN WAS A THIEF-- OPPORTUNISTICALLY EMPLOYED AT THE US PATENTS OFFICE..

    http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2014/08/yellapragada-subbarow-nobel-prize-and.html

    MAINAK SARKAR SHOT DEAD HIS JEW PROFESSOR WHO PASSED ON HIS INTELLECTUAL RIGHTS TO ANOTHER JEW STUDENT...

    https://www.huffingtonpost.in/2016/06/03/ucla-shooter-mainak-sarkar_n_10274290.html

    BALLS TO THE WHITE JEWS, WHO HAVE ALSO USURPED HOLLYWOOD TO SHOW THAT THEIR WEIRD STANDARDS OF KOSHER BEAUTY IS THE MODEL FOR HUMAN BEAUTY..


    THANKS GOD THEY COULD NOT RIG THE OLYMPICS AND BEAT USAIN BOLT..

    IN OPEN IQ COMPETITION WHITE JEWS ARE NOWHERE --UNLESS A JEW SETS AND CORRECTS THE EXAM / ANSWER PAPER..

    THANK GOD FOR THE INTERNET

    capt ajit vadakayil
    ..

    PUT ABOVE COMMENT IN WEBSITES OF-- 
    PMO
    PM MODI
    ALL CENTRAL-STATE MINISTER AND MINISTRIES
    CJI
    CMs OF ALL STATES ( LEAVE OUT MOMOTO AND KACHRAWAAL )
    EVERY DESH BHAKT LEADER
    PRESDIENT OF INDIA
    VP OF INDIA
    DGPs OF ALL STATES 
    RSS
    VHP
    AVBP
    DEANS OF ALL IITs OF INDIA
    SPREAD ON SOCIAL MEDIA

    capt ajit vadakayil
    ..

    KIM JONG UN , THE RULER OF NORTH KOREA MUST KNOW THIS..

    SOUTH KOREA AND THE WHITE JEWS HAVE BEEN APPLYING THE "CARROT AND STICK" POLICY ON NORTH KOREA--LITERALLY TREATING NORTH KOREA LIKE A STUPID DONKEY…

    THIS POLICY IS KNOWN AND THE "SUNSHINE POLICY"..

    THE PROPAGANDA IS IT IS LIFTED FROM THE "AESOP FABLES"..
    WELL, AESOP FABLES IS 100% LIFTED FROM "PANCHATANTRA TALES " OF INDIA..

    http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2011/02/super-panchatantra-capt-ajit-vadakayil.html

    APOLLONIUS OF TYANA WAS A SAGE FROM KERALA , WHOSE LEGACY WAS PASSED ON TO A COOKED UP JESUS CHRIST IN 325 AD, AT THE FIRST COUNCIL OF NICEA BY ROMAN EMPEROR CONSTANTIN THE GREAT..

    MOST OF THE PANCHATANTRA TALES WERE NARRATED BY APOLLONIUS OF TYANA .. IN OVER 8 DECADES OF LECTURES IN ROME, AND THESE STORIES WERE KNOWN TO INDIANS THREE MILLINIUMS BEFORE ......

    http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2016/10/the-huge-statue-of-colossus-of-rome-at.html

    http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2017/12/the-rotating-statue-on-nemi-ship-on.html


    PLATO STOLE THESE STORIES ( TAUGHT AT KODUNGALLUR UNIVERISTY ) PHILOSOPHY CLASSES AND WENT BACK TO GREECE AND NARRATED THEM AS IF HE INVENTED THESE STORIES.. HE NEATLY REPLACED ANIMALS AND BIRDS ( TIGER/ PEACOCK ETC ) WITH WESTERN ANIMALS AND BIRDS ..

    GETTING BACK..

    THE NORTH WIND AND THE SUN IS A PANCHATANTRA STORY, WRITTEN 5000 YEARS AGO...THIS IS THE BASIS OF THE "SUNSHINE POLICY"..

    QUOTE: The North Wind and the Sun were disputing which was the stronger, when a traveler came along wrapped in a warm cloak. They agreed that the one who first succeeded in making the traveler take his cloak off should be considered stronger than the other. Then the North Wind blew as hard as he could, but the more he blew the more closely did the traveler fold his cloak around him; and at last the North Wind gave up the attempt. Then the Sun shined out warmly, and immediately the traveler took off his cloak. And so the North Wind was obliged to confess that the Sun was the stronger of the two.:UNQUOTE 

    The Sunshine Policy is the policy of South Korea towards North Korea during Kim Dae-jung’s presidency. ..

    The formal name of the policy was the "Comprehensive Engagement Policy towards North Korea" and first announced by the 15th South Korean President, Kim Dae-jung, in 1998 with white JEW help. He would be given Nobel Prize for this in 2000 AD…

    By the way KIMs have Indian DNA and are ruler class of Korea.

    http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2012/07/korean-brahmins-kim-hae-clan-capt-ajit.html

    NORTH KOREA IS RICHER THAN SAUDI ARABIA..

    http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2017/03/regime-change-in-north-korea-rare.html

    The term "Sunshine Policy" was originated from one of Aesop's fables, "The North Wind and the Sun," as the policy aimed for loosening containment on North Korea, embracing North Korea, and eventually making the North Korean government to denuclearize by itself.

    The Sunshine Policy refers to the theoretical basis for South Korea's foreign policy towards North Korea…. the idea built on the traditional Korean ways of dealing with enemies by giving them gifts to prevent them from causing harm.. Facing bankruptcy and spending excessive portion of its funds on warfare along with the nuclear program, North Korea faced widespread starvation among its people during the time..

    These principles were meant to convey the message that the South does not wish to absorb the North or to undermine its government; its goal was peaceful co-existence rather than regime change

    The Sunshine policy was based on three following principles: ----
    ## No armed provocation by the North will be tolerated.
    ## The South will not attempt to absorb the North in any way. ( THE WHITE JEW WANTS THE RARE EARTHS OF NORTH KOREA )
    ## The South actively seeks cooperation.


    CONTINUED TO 2---



    1. CONTINUED FROM 1---


      THE WHITE JEW DID NOT WANT THE RE-UNIFICATION OF KOREA IN A HAPPY AND AMICABE MANNER. THEY WANTED NORTH TO COME DOWN ON ITS KNEES AND THEN BE ABSORBED BY SOUTH KOREA. ..

      By addressing the second principle, the South Korea halted forming tension with North Korea and appeased North Korea to reduce its spending in defense..

      Besides its direct influence on inter-Korean relations, the Sunshine Policy tremendously helped South Korean economy. It had been historically shown that more than billions of dollar evaporate in just one day whenever North Korea announced some antagonistic policy toward the South or caused military provocation on the South, because foreign investors then regarded the South Korean market as unstable

      The third bullet point explicitly implied that the South would put unprecedented amount of effort and investment into the North if North Korea becomes cooperative. As a result, Kaesong Industrial Region (or KIR), a special administrative industrial region of North Korea, where 53,000 North Koreans and 800 South Koreans are employed and work together, was constructed. .

      There was a substantial economic benefit to South Korea too. At the beginning of Kim Dea-jung's administration, South Korea was just bailed out from the IMF, so the South had to avoid confrontationist policy toward the North. In this sense, this coexistence, reconciliation policy helped South Korea from recovering its economic from the nadir.

      The US DEEP STATE used the Sunshine Policy as a political gain in domestic politics in the South.

      Because of the post-1998 'Sunshine policy', many South Korean nongovernmental organizations and the public weren't concerned about North Korea's threats, believing that Pyongyang would never use nuclear weapons against them..

      WITH KIM OF NORTH KOAREA HAVING ICBM MISSILES WHICH CAN DESTROY US CITIES “SUNSHINE POLICCY” IS FLUSED DOWN THE DRAIN..

      NORTH KOREANS HAVE SUFFERED ENOUGH.

      http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2017/03/japanese-in-hiroshima-and-nagasaki.html

      Capt ajit vadakayil
      ..


      PUT ABOVE COMMENT IN WEBSITES OF--
      PMO
      PM MODI
      AJIT DOVAL
      CMs OF ALL STATES ( LEAVE OUT MOOTO AND KACHRAWAAL )
      RSS
      VHP
      AVBP
      SWAMY
      GURUMURTHY
      CJI
      SPEAKER LOK SABHA
      SPEAKER RAJYA SABHA
      NITI AYOG
      AMITABH KANT

      ALL DESH BHAKT LEADERS OF INDIA
      SPREAD ON SOCIAL MEDIA




























    WE THE PEOPLE ASK THE MODI GOVT TO DISMANTLE THE UNCONSTITUTIONAL COLLEGIUM JUDICIARY..    LET US SELECT BRIGHT JUDGES ON THE BASIS OF AN ALL INDIA ENTRANCE EXAM LIKE IIT/ IAS…

    THE PRESENT LAWYER TURNED JUDGES SYSTEM HAS PRODUCED BELOW AVERAGE IQ JUDGES WHO CANNOT GLEAN THE CONSTITUTION OR APPLY BODMAS TO PRIORITIZE..
    WHEN A MLA ( OF A PRE-POLL ALLIANCE ) CROSS VOTES ON THE FLOOR OF THE HOUSE , IT CAN BE TERMED DEFECTION.


    WHEN A MLA ( VICTIM OF AN OPPORTUNISTIC POST POLL ALLIANCE ) CROSS VOTES ON THE FLOOR OF THE HOUSE , IT MUST BE TERMED AS “ESCAPING WITH CONSCIENCE INTACT

    JDS MLAs HAVE BEEN VOTED IN BY HINDU VOTERS WHO DID NOT WANT ANY ALLIANCE WITH THE “DESH KE TUKDE HONGE INSHAAH ALLAH ITALIAN MAFIA “…

    CONGRESS IS LED BY ITALIAN HALF BREED STAR SON.

    JDS IS LED BY STAR SON KUMARASWAMY..

    KUMARASWAMY WANTS TO BE CM BY HOOK OR BY CROOK — IT IS ALL PERSONAL GREED..HE DID NOT CARE FOR THE SENTIMENTS OF HIS MLAs AND JDS VOTERS 


    VERY SOON THIS STAR KID KUMARASWAMY WILL START MILKING THE SYSTEM – AT THAT TIME CATCH HIM AND SEND HIM TO JAIL LIKE LALU PRASAD YADAV.. 



    WARN KUMARASWAMY WELL IN ADVANCE , THAT HE CANNOT EVEN FART WITHOUT BEING CAUGHT…

    WHITHER DEMOCRACY?

    INDIA IS WORSE THAN A BANANA REPUBLIC..

    THE DAY IS NOT FAR WHEN MOMOTO BANNERJEE OR SASHIKALA WILL BE PM, WIH THE HELP OF DEEP STATE OPERATIVES FUNDED BY AGENTS OF WHITE MEN …


    THERE IS ANOTHER FLOOR TEST IN 15 DAYS FOR CONGRESS/ JDS... 



    ASK JDS MPs TO USE APPLY THEIR CONSCIENCE AND ACT AS PER THE WILL OF THE JDS VOTERS WHO VOTED FROM THEM... THESE VOTERS DO NOT CARE FOR THE SELFISH GOWDA FATHER/ SON DUO..

    Capt ajit vadakayil
    ..

    PUT ABOVE COMMENT IN WEBSITES OF--
    PRESIDENT OF INDIA
    VP OF INDIA
    PM MODI
    KARNATAKA GOVERNOR
    ALL STATE GOVERNORS
    CMs OF ALL STATES ( LEAVE OUT MOMOTO AND KACHRA FUCKIN' WAAL )
    DGPs OF ALL STATES
    ATTORNEY GENERAL 
    SUPREME COURT BAR COUNCIL
    CJI
    SWAMY
    GURUMURTY
    RSS
    VHP
    AVBP
    AMIT SHAH
    SPEAKER LOK SABHA
    SPEAKER RAJYA SABHA
    AJIT DOVAL 
    NITI AYOG
    DESH BHAKT JOURNALISTS
    ALL CENTRAL-STATE MINISTERS AND MINISTRES
    DESH BHAKT LEADERS 
    SPREAD ON SOCIAL MEDIA.






    Very sad day for democracy Captain. You are right that unholy post-poll alliances may throw BJP out of central politics next year.

    Now the big question is whether PM Modi and Amit Shah can check mate the opposition in 2019?

    President and Governor are still the CEREMONIAL posts in India. It has been proved time and time again.




    1. FIRST STEP IS TO PUNISH THE THREE COLLEGIUM JUDGES WHO HAVE OVER RULED THE GOVERNOR OF KARNATAKA... WHO IS VESTED WITH DISCRETIONARY POWERS BY THE CONSTITUTION..

      THE GOVERNOR NEED NOT ADHERE TO PAST PRECEDENT

      JUDGES DONT HAVE SUCH ARBITRARY POWERS TO OVERRULE THE STATE GOVERNOR..

      PUNISHMENT IS LOSS OF SENIORITY AND CUT IN SALARY.

      ONE MORE SUCH MISDEMEANOR-- THE THREE JUDGES MUST BE DEFROCKED WITH LOSS OF PENSION AND PERKS..

      WHAT IS THE USE OF HAVING A LAW MINISTER CALLED PRASAD ?

      capt ajit vadakayil
      ..

    https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/hindi/bollywood/photo-features/priyanka-chopras-heartfelt-note-for-meghan-markle-will-warm-your-hearts/photostory/64239902.cms

    BTM ( BEHENJI TURNED MOD ) PRIYANKA CHOPRA ...ALWAYS OVER THE TOP..

    HER GRANDMOTHER IS MALAYALI..

    WE ARE SUPPOSED TO BELIEVE THAT SHE IS A LANGOT YAAR OF MEGHAN MARKLE

    “Every once in a while there is a moment when time stands still.. that happened today.. You my friend.. were the epitome of grace, love and beauty. Every choice made at this wedding by you both will go down in history, not just because it was your wedding but because this incredible wedding stood for change and hope. Both things that the world needs desperately. Thank you for being the perfect picture of all things good.. seeing your union and love blessed in front of my eyes Made me so happy.. and tear up! I wish you both love happiness and togetherness always..”

    AIYOOOOOOOOOOOOO !

    https://www.express.co.uk/celebrity-news/962197/Priyanka-Chopra-Meghan-Markle-dress-Royal-Wedding-2018-news-latest-pictures

    CHECK OUT PRIYANKA CHOPRAs RIDICULOUS HEAD GEAR IN THE POST WBOVE

    HEY-- I AM MISSING A BALD NAXAL NAMED SATINATH SARANGI WHO USED TO WEAR A RIDICULOUS HEADGEAR IN ARNAB GOSWAMIs SHOW ON TIMESNOW TV COUPLE OF YEARS AGO ..

    ONLY LAST WEEK MY WIFE REMINDED ME-- OF MY SONG WHICH I DEDICATED TO HIS HEAD GEAR

    I GUESS I WILL NOW DEDICATE THE SAME SONG TO PRIYANKA CHOPRA-- ALWAYS OVER THE TOP-- THE NEW TRAGEDY QUEEN ..

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gAjqt5YgcSU

    PUT ABOVE IN PRIYANKA CHOPRAs AND ARNAB GOSWAMIs WEBSITES

    capt ajit vadkayil
    ..




    CAPT AJIT VADAKAYIL
    ..